Rob Browning writes:
> With respect to the license, I thought of that while I was poking around
> last night. I'm not sure if this plays nice with the GPL or not.
I think it would require an exception clause: everyone who holds copyright
to any GPL'd gnucash code would have to agree to a license addendum saying
"this software may be linked with Berkely DB" or something similar. I'm
certainly willing to agree to such a thing for my one tiny little patch:
in fact, I'm willing to assign it to Linas or Dave or someone.
> I wouldn't be surprised if the sleepycat people would be willing to offer
> it under the GPL as well as the current license (presuming they have the
> authority to do so).
I just casually glanced through the Sleepycat license, but it looked to me
like they would be giving up nothing by releasing under the GPL.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
