> On Sat, 13 May 2000, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 May 2000, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > > > > As for changing "reconciled" transactions, it is unclear to me what
> > > > > relationship exists between the "transaction" and the "JEs".
> > > >
> > > > It is the JEs that get reconciled.
> > >
> > > Right. But to what does the "Payee" belong?
> >
> > I presume whoever you wrote the cheque out to.
> 
> I think that you missed by point. My question was
> "With respect to reconciliation, when is the 'payee' field considered to be 
> reconciled?"

I guess I missed your point because I don't understand what it means
to reconcile a 'payee' field.

> Remember that a "transaction" has to be reconciled multiple times, once for 
> each of the JE splits that make up the transaction.
> 

Reply via email to