-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 04 May 2004 11:09 am, Derek Atkins wrote: > I'll repeat my statement again: We should LAG gnome releases by AT > LEAST 6-9 months... Minimum. And indeed we should pick a "base > distro" (I'd argue FC1 at this point) and make sure our code works on > that distro. If we do not do this, we've done our users a major > dis-service.
Well, gnome 2.4 has already been out for eight months now. By the time we release gnucash 2, it will have been out for over a year. I admit gnome 2.6 will be pushing it, but 2.4 (or later) is already part of FC1, Debian testing, Mandrake 10, and Suse 9.1. Then again since I did nothing for the Gnome 2 port, this opinion is worth little more than the electrons used to display it. - -- Benoit Gr�goire, http://step.polymtl.ca/~bock/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAl8oFmZ6zzPlLuwMRAldaAKCBSnPbhCpiflI7vaLyUwYfFrijoQCeNeDp Kj8skpyLUpTUqHxSDw6QR1I= =poWE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
