On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:07:48PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > BTW, is there any precedent for patches like this to be placed in some > > sort of "patches in progress" area of CVS? That way, they can be > > versioned, easily retrieved, revised, and tested, with no impact on the > > rest of the tree. > > Nope. The patches are either "good enough" to get committed to CVS, > or they are not. There's no in-between. > > The two main conditions to get committed are: > 1) The architecture needs to be "clean" and fit with the rest of the code, and > 2) The resultant (patched) tree needs to compile and run. > > Note that non-finished features are welcome (provided there is some > hope that they WILL be finished "soon"), although it's "better" if > the feature is finished before it's submitted. YMMV. >
Do I understand correctly that the conditions to add a single file, testing/try-my-patch.diff, to the CVS repository are the same as to commit all of the changes contained in that diff to all of the various affected files in the tree? -chris > > -derek > > -- > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
