On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 14:32 -0800, Bill Wohler wrote: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've either been involved with, or done personally, a couple of CVS to > Subversion conversions. Even the large one that affected our entire > company went really, really smoothly.
As well, a large reason for doing this provisionally last week was to un-un-expect problems. > > Geez, how hard is it to get the G2 release out the door BEFORE doing > > this stuff?? > > If they are more than a month away, chances are that this will have a > negligible effect on the date. But there is always a small chance that > your premonition comes true ;-) so your point is a good one. I'd guess we're still months away from releasing 2.0. > And if you guys are using the SourceForge CVS repository, chances are We're not. > >> - Branch/tag Naming: it seems like a rename ["gnucash-1-6-branch" -> > >> "gnucash/branches/1.6"] is reasonable. Last-minute objections? > > That is the normal method. I'd also expect to see gnucash/tags/1.8.12 > and HEAD in gnucash/trunk. Ah, Bill, you might not have seen http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/2005-October/014333.html which has details about the repository layout and the question re: renaming. ...jsled -- http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
