Quoting Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Yea, I noticed this myself. Apparantly building g-wrap-1.9.6 depends on
glib-devel.. I fixed it myself by changing the glib to glib2 in
configure.in, running 'autoconf', and then re-running configure.
Actually, this always made me curious - how does pulling both
glib1 and glib2 into the same address space *not* cause problems?
Honestly, I don't know. I've never seen it cause a problem. In fact
all my development (on FC3) has used g-wrap 1.3.4. Unforunately the
g-wrap-1.9.6 configure script doesn't properly detect the lack of glib1,
so it tries to build it even when it's not able to (which is the cause of
the g-wrap build error). I'm not sure whether gnucash2 requires the g-wrap
glib bindings... But you can certainly build g-wrap against glib2 with
that small configure modification.
Unfortunately Rotty has been unresponsive to my emails to him, which is
a problem. I can't get 1.9.6 to work at all on solaris -- libffi fails.
Rotty, if you're reading this -- Please Help!
Bill
-derek
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
