On Monday 13 February 2006 10:34 am, Christian Stimming wrote: > Hi all, > And there is also a slashdot entry > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/09/1853239 , posted by someone > I don't know, and (of course) the slashdot "community" of trolls and > slashers and a small minority of serious discussions doesn't have too > many friendly things to say. Surprisinly enough, a non-negligible > fraction of comments is relatively friendly and even seems to have > understood the point of an "unstable release, intended for developers > and tester", in stark contrast to the majority of "first post" comments
One interesting comment from Josh: Well, we use gtkhtml for rendering the reports, which emit html. While we used to have it setup to do "arbitrary" browsing, I'm pretty sure that's not working in 2.0. It [abritrary browsing from w/in GnuCash] is certainly not a direction the current devs are interested in going. As the "Custom Web Report" isn't working in svn (I've checked - it prints messages about wanting a replacement library), shouldn't we just remove it? -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpuK7zBD28Jy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
