Should this get backported to 2.0? -derek
Quoting Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Derek Atkins schrieb: >> Sounds like a good idea to me. > > Applied in r15161. > > Christian > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iQCVAwUBRW2je2XAi+BfhivFAQJwngQAtBrZ8lySFKhTX1fgRF1txQusC9lahOkb > Dvoo8Fhi69I0/dRiqY7HnJ084X/Whlbe0TxrTkZXW55VJMkF2//TjXsj8JpaUVQi > 9+Yq/cpLDp6Lf5Y/fBkD4MoELE7pmhZiYGHhH66Oo4+0qWIa8xrdI5vZoslf4t0z > GojOAE6daF8= > =bRZZ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
