-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Derek Atkins schrieb: > Should this get backported to 2.0?
Probably yes. It merges without any issues (except for gncAddress.c where these functions don't exist in branch-2.0). I'd probably vote for back-porting. Audits, anyone? Christian > Quoting Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Derek Atkins schrieb: >>>> Sounds like a good idea to me. > > Applied in r15161. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRW2pVmXAi+BfhivFAQKDrwP+MSxnZiSHhuq2TNIctTlPfbBnWNgFaGWy SvDF+WfVm1V9QULv2+q4gdd9iX6q9xYOPbQZGQyi6l8XVvr9veHHJF0mxrjD/8Ak KTNFa8ZWzzWtboNvq5yATl5lrYRj5VHm4T8Nn4OBSRRYQ5KwE8lA7aJtnkvfuo3K wTPmfeqoYKE= =sJYR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
