Josh Sled wrote: > Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Instead, if there is anyone interested, I would recommend that they > > adapt the swig .i files to the popular scripting language of their > > preference, and use the popular templating system of their choice. > > This is a far better engineering decision, IMO, and far easier to do, > > also. It's probably about 80 hours work to the initial working system > > for someone already familiar with the relevant tools. > > While certainly people are free to do as they will, I think it makes sense > to have a rational discussion about the particular language/templating > system. > Lurking in this list, I have only read the last postings, so excuse me if I'm wrong: Would it pay to let PHP access the invoice data (sth. like a PHP module with bindings to gnc model) ? Then, PHP, widely adopted for html templating, could handle all sorts of forms.
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
