Hi, On Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008, Christian Stimming wrote: > Quoting Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] > > --- Style 6 --- > > // comment line 1 > > // comment line 2 > > > > My personal preference has always been style 6, > > Although my personal preference would be style 6, too, some older > compilers would still barf on those C++ / C99 comments. However, I'm > also not sure whether it is of any value to be considerate of non-C99 > compilers (i.e. C89) as I think we have plenty of C99 constructs > already in the code. > > Definitely avoided should be style 3, and maybe to a lesser extent style 1. [...]
I would definately avoid style 6 since some c compilers spit out warnings when these comments are used (e.g. on some distributions I get these warnings with gcc, too. It accepts those comments but still warns about those C++ style comments). Regards Martin -- "Things are only impossible until they're not" Martin Preuss - http://www.aquamaniac.de/ AqBanking - http://www.aqbanking.de/ LibChipcard - http://www.libchipcard.de/ _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
