On Jan 30, 2008 4:10 AM, Martin Preuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008, Christian Stimming wrote: > > Quoting Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [...] > > > --- Style 6 --- > > > // comment line 1 > > > // comment line 2 > > > > > > My personal preference has always been style 6, > > > > Although my personal preference would be style 6, too, some older > > compilers would still barf on those C++ / C99 comments. However, I'm > > also not sure whether it is of any value to be considerate of non-C99 > > compilers (i.e. C89) as I think we have plenty of C99 constructs > > already in the code. > > > > Definitely avoided should be style 3, and maybe to a lesser extent style > 1. > [...] > > I would definately avoid style 6 since some c compilers spit out warnings > when > these comments are used (e.g. on some distributions I get these warnings > with > gcc, too. It accepts those comments but still warns about those C++ style > comments). > > > Regards > Martin >
Are those warnings a problem, other than visual? There are already more than 750 lines of GnuCash code that use this style. > > -- > "Things are only impossible until they're not" > > Martin Preuss - http://www.aquamaniac.de/ > AqBanking - http://www.aqbanking.de/ > LibChipcard - http://www.libchipcard.de/ > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
