Hi Manfred, I am sorry for answering that late and am going to be rather responsive the following days :-)
Am Donnerstag, den 20.03.2008, 08:33 +0100 schrieb Manfred Usselmann: > Hi, > > Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Wed, 19 Mar 2008 > 22:16:26 +0100: > > > Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 08:21 schrieb Manfred Usselmann: > > > > > > I just wanted to ask if somebody is already working on the > > > AqBanking 3 port when I read your mail. > > > > Nobody is working on it yet. > > > > > Since I have never done any development work for GnuGash and > > > AqBanking and also have only limited time it will definitely take > > > some time until it will be done. But I had the impression that > > > until now nobody is working on it and it needs to be done sooner or > > > later... > > > > > > But if you accept the challenge that would probably lead to an > > > earlierer result since you have at least experience with GnuCash > > > development in contrast to me. > > > > > > Would it make sense if I nevertheless start to familiarised myself > > > with the sources? Would it be possible to share the workload? > > > > It would make sense in any case. Even if Andreas implemented the > > majority of source code changes, we would still need lots of testing: > > All the different security media have to be tested 1. when being > > upgraded from aqbanking2, and also 2. when being newly set up. > > OK, makes sense. That is really cool! Any help is greatly appreciated. I guess my motivation was like yours: "someone has to do that someday". > > I'd suggest to keep the wiki page as up to date as possible, i.e. > > adding more tasks once they have been identified, and adding > > descriptions of what has been found out and maybe solved so far. > > Could you please send me the link to this wiki page again? http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/AqBanking3_Porting Currently I wonder about two things I cannot decide yet, namely whether it will make sense to create a branch to work on the port and, if we do, to create an import-export module "aqbanking". From my naive point of view, this will * avoid a lot of #if's * has a better chance not to break aqbanking2 * might be easier to backport * finally renames hbci which is not hbci only anyway but also * copy a lot of code and * maybe be harder to maintain afterwards I suppose this simply depends on how big the changes between aq2/gwen2 and aq3/gwen3 programming actually are. Maybe Christian has an idea :-) -- andi5
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
