On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Ian Smith-Heisters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Would it be advisable to run the python bindings against a different >> version of GnuCash than I actually use on a daily basis? Would it be >> possible to not install the svn version, ie. compile it and leave it >> in the compilation directory so that it doesn't get in the way of my >> package-installed version? > > No, this would be a particularly poor idea.. Assuming the > bindings would link properly, it would probably crash due to > changes between 2.2 and trunk.
ok, then. Last question: is there any kind of schedule/idea of when the bindings will make it to a stable release and from thence to distro packages? I really don't want to go through the PITA that was running GnuCash from a custom compile--these packages are a godsend. Although it might be easier with the correct dependencies available in package form now... > >> Thanks, >> Ian > > -derek > > -- > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
