On November 24, 2008 12:32:14 pm Derek Atkins wrote: > "Ian Smith-Heisters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> "Ian Smith-Heisters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Would it be advisable to run the python bindings against a different > >>> version of GnuCash than I actually use on a daily basis? Would it be > >>> possible to not install the svn version, ie. compile it and leave it > >>> in the compilation directory so that it doesn't get in the way of my > >>> package-installed version? > >> > >> No, this would be a particularly poor idea.. Assuming the > >> bindings would link properly, it would probably crash due to > >> changes between 2.2 and trunk. > > > > ok, then. Last question: is there any kind of schedule/idea of when > > the bindings will make it to a stable release and from thence to > > distro packages? > > Um, when 2.4 is ready? > The python bindings are not slated for backport to 2.2
Is there either a proposed 2.4 date or feature set? Phil _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
