Perhaps it would be easier if I just made the changes in glade-2? I had no idea it would be a problem.
I'm sure I have an older dev machine somewhere... On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Derek Atkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Geert Janssens <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Friday 22 January 2010, Derek Atkins wrote: > >> I thought we were waiting until after 2.4.0 branched before we converted > >> to glade-3? I'm worried about EL5 support. > >> > > You are right about the agreed timing. > > > > I don't think there's a problem here though. The glade file has been > saved > > with Glade 3.x, which causes the lines in the file to be rearranged. > > > > But Glade 3.x (the tool) can be configured to write Gtk+ 2.8 compatible > files. > > And that's what happened in this case. > > > > (from the glade file:) > > <!-- interface-requires gtk+ 2.8 --> > > > > We did agree that 2.8 was to be the base version for 2.4.0. > > I'm also worried about libglade-2 being able to read it at runtime. > > -derek > -- > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH > [email protected] PGP key available > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
