Zitat von Derek Atkins <[email protected]>:
Thomas Troesch <[email protected]> writes:
Perhaps it would be easier if I just made the changes in glade-2? I had no
idea it would be a problem.
I'm sure I have an older dev machine somewhere...
In the short term that's probably a good idea, but the glade-3 file was
already committed.
The problem with glade2/glade3 is that it is getting increasingly
difficult to obtain a glade-2 program. For example, the recent Ubuntu
versions (which I happen to use) don't offer any glade-2 package
anymore, only glade-3.
Also, please keep a close look on what actually has changed here:
Except from the removed DOCTYPE line at the top of the file, the rest
of the changes are *solely* indentation changes. As Geert already
pointed out: It is important to keep the correct "interface-requires"
comment line in there, but apart from this, I can't see that any of
our target platforms wouldn't be able to read this file.
A completely different issue is the question whether we allow the
usage of new widgets, which would increase the required minimum gtk
version. We decided not to do this ATM, but this discussion is
orthogonal to whether the glade xml indentations should be kept at
glade-2 or can be upgraded to glade-3 file by file.
Regards,
Christian
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
