On Saturday 20 February 2010, Christian Stimming wrote: > Am Freitag, 19. Februar 2010 schrieb Geert Janssens: > > I'd like to bump the minimum required glib2 for the 2.3.x series to 2.12. > > I'm all in for raising our minimum required version to some higher and more > recent value. > > My main reason is that all of us developers use more recent versions, which > means we also test only on the more recent versions. Even if we pretend the > older versions might still compile, they are for sure not tested at all. > Eventually we're better off to say the old versions are neither tested nor > can be used for compiling instead of saying they might be used for > compiling but we have no idea whether they still work. > > Hence, I'm all in for glib2-2.12 and even higher versions. glib2-2.12 is the new base version. Reason is that RHEL5 ships it, which is the most conservative, yet still maintained disto we care about.
> The gtk requirement should be updated as well, I guess. > I'm currently working on this one. Gtk 2.10 will be the base for now. I did request an upgrade on the RHEL bugzilla to at least 2.12. We will need this if we want to remove deprecated functions and be compatible with gnome 3. But that's a concern for after 2.4. I do wish we could set a higher base for guile though. It's about the only dependency left that requires a special compat header file. Upgrading this one before the final 2.4 release allows me to do some additional code refactoring for a more consistent use of the guile api. I started this just before new year due to incompatibilities with guile 1.8.6+. Doing this refactoring before 2.4 is branched will make it easier to backport patches from trunk to the 2.4 later. I the refactoring happened after the branch, it will be harder to backport (because the code bases diverged). For linux distro's there's no problem. All current distros ship 1.8+ The issue here is the windows build. It is still configured to use 1.6. Since we're working in the dependency areo on the windows build atm, it may be a good time to switch to 1.8 there as well ? Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
