On Mar 2, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> writes: > >> lib/srfi/README says that the srfis are there to support older >> versions of Guile which don't include them; the minimum version of >> Guile that configure will accept is 1.6.0, which does distribute the >> srfis, so should the srfi directory and attendant configure checks go >> away? > > I think it's PROBABLY safe to remove these now. >
Hmm. That means that it would need to be thoroughly tested. Do the current tests provide sufficient coverage to make sure that without is OK? Alternatively, if I do a build against Guile-1.6.0 and the gnucash srfis aren't pulled in, is that good enough? Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
