On May 31, 2013, at 4:52 AM, Geert Janssens <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1. Which lists are you subscribed to ? > a. gnucash-changes > b. gnucash-patches > c. both > d. none
gnucash-patches only
> 2. If you're only subscribed to one, why that one ?
If I want to look at the details of the change it's easy enough to do so and
the summaries are all I normally need.
>
> 3. Do you think gnucash needs two lists ? Why yes or why no ?
I don't really care, but one list is probably enough
>
> 4. For the future:
> a. We should keep the two list as they are now:
> gnucash-changes should have the detailed logs
> gnucash-patches should have the summaries
> b. We should keep two lists, but swap the contents:
> gnucash-patches should have the detailed logs
> gnucash-changes should have the summaries
> c. I think we only need one list with detailed logs
> d. I think we only need one list with summaries
Anything other than c is fine with me. However, all the repositories should be
the same. As it is now I get detailed logs for htdocs and summaries for
everything else.
Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
