Geert Janssens <[email protected]> schrieb:
>1. Which lists are you subscribed to ?
> a. gnucash-changes
> b. gnucash-patches
> c. both
> d. none
B. Only -patches.
>2. If you're only subscribed to one, why that one ?
Due to occasional bandwidth constraints I don't want the full diff every time.
>
>3. Do you think gnucash needs two lists ? Why yes or why no ?
Yes. Both workflows are useful and chosen by various developers.
>4. For the future:
> a. We should keep the two list as they are now:
> gnucash-changes should have the detailed logs
> gnucash-patches should have the summaries
> b. We should keep two lists, but swap the contents:
> gnucash-patches should have the detailed logs
> gnucash-changes should have the summaries
> c. I think we only need one list with detailed logs
> d. I think we only need one list with summaries
A. Keep everything as before. Reason: I'm lazy and prefer not to change
settings anywhere.
>
>You may motivate your answers :)
>
>Geert
>_______________________________________________
>gnucash-devel mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
--
Sent from mobile.
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
