On Friday 28 August 2015 15:53:17 Derek Atkins wrote: > I suspect another issue with using ODT instead of DocBook is that we'd > have a single file for the whole document, versus a separate file for > each chapter. This means that multiple people working in different > sections may very easily collide with each other through git, whereas > docbook changes would merge more cleanly. > > -derek > If the patches libreoffice generates were less cluttered that would probably not be a problem. Git is pretty good at merging non-conflicting patches (with which I mean patches that don't have overlapping changes) even on single files.
The clutter breaks that git feature though. Sigh... Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
