> On Sep 11, 2016, at 1:05 AM, David T. via gnucash-devel > <gnucash-devel@gnucash.org> wrote: > > but, my documentation itch needs scratching, and I want to make sure my > efforts at helping actually help. > > I’ve been generating traffic with ideas on how to improve the documentation, > and it seems to me I should dig back into the catacombs of Git to implement > some of my great suggestions. Please bear with me, as I have numerous areas > in git where I could use help. > > Before I start digging in to new bug fixes in the documentation, I want to be > sure I am working on a current copy of the documentation. For background, I > am working on a Mac, using SourceTree to navigate git. I have my own github > account at github.com <http://github.com/> and I have forked master from > https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash-docs > <https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash-docs>. > > On github, when I open my fork it says at the top: > > This branch is 27 commits behind Gnucash:master. > > I realize that I should do something to not be behind—but what precisely am I > supposed to do? Do I take action on github, or in Sourcetree? Which action? > > Next, my SourceTree maint repository points to > github.com/sunfish62/gnucash-docs <http://github.com/sunfish62/gnucash-docs>, > and I have 3 branches on my machine for three bugs I worked on in February > (743672, 762656, and 762088). The last two of these bugs now read on BugZilla > RESOLVED FIXED, while the first is still on BugZilla as NEW. My Sourcetree > screen looks like this: > > > > I am not sure what this signifies, whether I need to do something (or whether > whatever I do above will affect this). I note that the highlighted line > includes both 743672 and 762656; does this mean that I somehow added my > branch for 743672 to my branch for 762656? If that is what I did, I imagine > it would be preferable for 743672 to have its own branch; is there a way to > untangle them? > > Finally, on github, the pull request for 762656 originated with me, and John > and I exchanged some comments about technical aspects of the commit, and the > page concludes with the note: >> Closed with unmerged commits >> This pull request is closed, but the sunfish62:bug-762656 branch has >> unmerged commits. >> > > Clearly, I did Something; probably, I should clear this up. Can I simply > click the Delete Branch button—or will that cause the whole patch to go away? >
David, To bring your github repo up to date you need to pull from git://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash-docs, which will bring your local repo up to date, then push to git://github.com/sunfish62/gnucash-docs. You'll need to add that as a repository (select Repository>Repository Settings from the menu, then the Add button). I suggest you name it "upstream" to comport with Geert's naming convention in the wiki Git page. Be sure to tick the "rebase" box when pulling. Remember to pull both maint and master, and to push both as well. There are a couple more wrinkles: Because I changed the tags on PR52 (the one for bug 762656) on that commit you will either get a conflict when the rebase tries to apply it or it will morph into just changing those flags. I think it will be the conflict, in which case you want to skip it (git rebase --skip if you were doing it from the command line, SourceTree will have some GUI thing that does the same). If git figures out what to do on its own and morphs the commit you'll need to reset it. If you haven't made any other local commits you can just reset to the commit before it. Control-click on the previous commit and select "reset maint to this commit". The next wrinkle is that you need to force push to git://github.com/sunfish62/gnucash-docs and I don't think that SourceTree knows how to do that so you'll have to do it from the terminal. Click the Terminal button on the top right and then at the command line say git push -f origin maint You can get rid of the old feature branches in git://github.com/sunfish62/gnucash-docs while you're at Terminal: git push github :Bug-762088 git push github :bug-762656 Note the colon in front of the branch name. It's a version of `git push github foo:bar`, which you'd use if your local branch foo corresponded to branch bar on the remote, so "push local branch foo to remote branch bar". With only the second branch listed it means "push nothing to remote branch bar", which deletes remote branch bar. Since you've never made local changes to master you can push it normally from SourceTree. As for bug 743672, I'm planning to just delete the "What's New" sections this week unless someone objects. The mailing list eats inline attachments, so put screenshots at the end. It still might not work, the Mac mailer can be a bit uncooperative. I'd think you'd see the "unmerged commits" notice on both PR52 and 53 since I edited 52 and rebased 53. As I explained on 53, that changed the commits from the ones you submitted so github can't tell that your changes were in fact merged. The rebasing and force-pushing will change the comments to something about "obsolete commits", but you needn't worry about it. I'll be up on IRC later today so ask there if you need more help. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
