In this case, I think there is a strong argument that credit-notes must be ignored in the generation of aging-table? And this would apply for customer/job/vendor/employee aging tables, therefore only applying payment using credit-note will reduce the balances? Advantage is there will be no negative numbers in aging table.
In any case I'd think both owner-report and aging must be consistent. On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 14:11, Derek Atkins <de...@ihtfp.com> wrote: > Christopher Lam <christopher....@gmail.com> writes: > > > Yes, I agree. On that count aging.scm wins. > > What about Credit-Notes; should they automatically be applied to > invoices in > > the aging-table? > > Sneak preview next gen aging report: > > > https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1975870/61539513-36ba3780-aa2b-11e9-89d8-c1c35d945a04.png > > That's a good question, but I don't have a good answer. Arguably if the > credit note isn't applied then the report might want to separate them > out in a way to let them know that there is an unapplied credit. I'm > not sure GnuCash should assume which invoice to apply it to. > > -derek > -- > Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 > de...@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com > Computer and Internet Security Consultant > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
