On 10 Mar 2003 11:24:38 -0500, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

lmb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

gnucash _really_ needs an "save on exit" functionality, I think. (I can't do
it, my scheme sucks) Unix programs have been doing it for ages on receiving a
SIGHUP.

Gnucash does try to save on exit if you exit cleanly. At least it asks you if you want to save or not. IMHO this is "good enough". Once you exit gnome, or kill X, or shutdown your computer, or unplug the power, it's out of our control. At some point you can't handle all the stupid things that users do. I think we do a pretty good job of protecting stupid users from themselves, but frankly it can only go so far.


My opinion is that if user want to have that level of reliability (support a crash without losing txns) then they must choose the db backend. I think it is outside the core focus of the GNUcash developers to develop a journal of last transactions, which can be replayed at next startup, to recover lost transactions.


-derek




-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to