I know that I may sound a bit like a thorn in the side, but I try to bring to the table a sense of how users who would be migrating from Quicken would expect things. Derek - I agree that migrating to PG would be a good idea, but is it easy? Does someone have to know how to manage PG to get it to work? This is a valid concern for Quicken users who would consider migrating. Also, how is the PG database backed up? Quicken makes its backups nearly automatic and a non-issue. A simple click on OK and your backup is made.
As we all know, there is a price for simplicity. The question is, do we want to go that route?
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 10:15, TIm Wunder wrote:
problem is... I'm a heavy user of Scheduled Transactions and there is no support in the Prostgres backend for SX's (yet). But, yes, I agree, the Postgres backend would be more appropriate for that kinda thing. On 3/10/2003 12:06 PM, someone claiming to be Derek Atkins wrote: > If you want this, use the Postgres backend. That's what it's > for. > <snip desire to save users from themselves> _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
|
-- Kevin Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
