Michael Hendry <hendry.mich...@gmail.com> writes:
[snip]
> Which supports my contention that the use of the term “split” for a
> Ledger Entry causes confusion.
>
> Would anyone think it odd that a different process would be required
> when importing a compound transaction than when importing a simple
> one?
Importing or inputting?
Right now it's the same interface, in general. The only difference is
whether or not you expand the view to show all the splits.
You CAN enter basic (two-split) transactions in the expanded view. Or
you can enter them in the basic (one-line) view. Either way works, and
for many users the basic view is easier to understand.
However, if entering a three-or-more-split (what we call "multi-split",
often shortened to "split") transaction, one MUST used the expanded
view.
> Regards,
>
> Michael
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins 617-623-3745
de...@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com
Computer and Internet Security Consultant
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
