Op woensdag 20 maart 2019 12:35:40 CET schreef Michael Hendry: > > On 20 Mar 2019, at 10:52, Geert Janssens <geert.gnuc...@kobaltwit.be> > > wrote:> > > Op woensdag 20 maart 2019 10:51:55 CET schreef Michael Hendry: > >> Would anyone think it odd that a different process would be required when > >> importing a compound transaction than when importing a simple one? > > > > I think that depends on the input source format: csv is generic and > > doesn't > > strictly define how to encode accounting data. > > > > GnuCash tries cater for as many formats as possible. So it offers a way to > > import csv files with only one transaction per line or a csv file where > > each line consists of one ledger entry/split and hence transaction can > > span multiple lines. > > So the choice is between importing “Simple Transactions” and “Compound > Transactions”, with a two-line simple transaction as a special case of a > compound transaction.
Right. So would "simple transaction" vs "compound transaction" be a good candidate for better terminology ? Regards, Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
