No objection here —I always thought it odd that Liabilities didn’t have its own total line, and thought ’Transfers’ should only include Assets & Equity. (you are transferring one asset to another, with no effect on net position, but paying a liability would change your net position)
Creating separate totals for each of the major accounts would remove any ambiguity. Regards, Adrien > On Oct 29, 2019 w44d302, at 7:11 AM, Christopher Lam > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 15:32, Adrien Monteleone > <[email protected]> wrote: > “Transfers” = sum of amounts budgeted to Assets, Equity, or Liabilities > “Total” = Income - Expenses - Transfers > > I understand the meaning of budgeted income/expense, maybe the meaning of > budgeted asset/liabilities. I can't figure out the meaning of these above > formulas, given the difficult sign reversals previously discussed. > > Would anyone have any objection to removing these two and replace with the > classic Income/Expense/Asset/Liability/Equity budget totals? _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
