Thanks Geert, that makes sense.
Regards,
Adrien
On 2/10/21 3:24 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
Op woensdag 10 februari 2021 06:08:21 CET schreef Adrien Monteleone:
Out of curiosity, is there something to explain the numbering scheme for
reports? Is there a reason they don't follow the GnuCash version
pattern? (we're in version 4.x of GnuCash but reports go in a 2.8 folder)
This can get quite confusing when discussing app versions vs. reports.
Regards,
Adrien
We normally bump the file version number if we make incompatible changes.
There was in incompatible change between 2.6 and 3, but not between 2.4 and
2.6. So the 2.4 number was kept during the 2.6 series. 2.8 should ideally have
been named 3, but this version change to the saved-reports file was made at a
time we still thought we'd release a 2.8 series and was forgotten about when
we decided to go with 3 instead.
I don't remember if we did incompatible changes for the 4 series, but I think
not, hence the version number didn't bump.
Regards,
Geert
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
