Your suggestion sounds interesting, although in my case I have to map the side of the provider of the investment, because the community wants to "sell" shares to members, right? So, in the example, the community would be the hotel itself, which offers shares and wants to record them either as income or as open receivables.
One way to map this scenario could perhaps be: Assets:Community-Shares: holds the shares that the community offers. Income:Community-Shares: holds the membership payments already made for shares Assets:Accounts-Receivable:Community-Shares: holds the outstanding receivables for shares that have already been sold There would then be the cash flows "Assets:Community-Shares -> Income:Community-Shares" for paid amounts and "Assets:Community-Shares -> Assets:Accounts-Receivable:Community-Shares" for open amounts. The individual entries could reference the appropriate member in the description. The question that is still bothering me with this approach - if it makes any sense at all - is how I can credit a posting in the "Income:Community-Shares" account to a bank account in parallel, because with the posting Assets:Community-Shares -> Income:Community-Shares two accounts are already involved. On 01.08.23 16:09, Fred Tydeman wrote:
For a hotel being built, I bought 3 shares on credit in a private company In the Assets:Investment:Hotel which is an Account Type of Stock I bought 3 shares with the money for those shares coming from Liabilities:Loans:Hotel which is an Account Type of Liability. Then, as I get income from other places, that income is used to pay off the Hotel loan. So, perhaps, you could replace "Hotel" with "person1", "person2", ... in the above.
_______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
