Are you sure that advocated positions are written by real lawyers? It's more like that they take it from paralegals. I have heard of how disastrous it has been if lawyers are just using AI tools only -- like citing cases that don't exist, etc....
-----Original Message----- From: Patrick James <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2026 10:53 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [GNC] AI policy on wiki > On 08/14/2026 4:01 AM PDT David Kirkby via gnucash-user > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have asked ChatGPT to develop me code I would release for GPL. It > then inserts comments at the start to say the code is released under the GPL. > So, whilst like yourself I don't have a legal background, I don't > think copyright should be an issue. Since ChatGPT is not a lawyer licensed to practice law, I am not so sure that ChatGPT has the legal authority to determine the software licensing of its output. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
