I mean, sure, if you're suggesting ChatGPT sometimes gives terrible legal advice, we are on the same page.
> On 08/14/2026 4:47 PM PDT Kalpesh Patel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Are you sure that advocated positions are written by real lawyers? It's more > like that they take it from paralegals. I have heard of how disastrous it has > been if lawyers are just using AI tools only -- like citing cases that don't > exist, etc.... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick James <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, August 14, 2026 10:53 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [GNC] AI policy on wiki > > > On 08/14/2026 4:01 AM PDT David Kirkby via gnucash-user > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I have asked ChatGPT to develop me code I would release for GPL. It > > then inserts comments at the start to say the code is released under the > > GPL. > > So, whilst like yourself I don't have a legal background, I don't > > think copyright should be an issue. > > Since ChatGPT is not a lawyer licensed to practice law, I am not so sure that > ChatGPT has the legal authority to determine the software licensing of its > output. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
