Hi Dan, Thanks for the responses, all. I've been running a couple 3.8 bots on default settings on KGS and they consistently play at 4-5k, which is a bit too strong for me.
There's an 11k bot running 2.0 that is perfect for learning, which is what started my inquiry here. Just FYI. On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 9:19 AM Daniel Bump <b...@sporadic.stanford.edu> wrote: > > > The level settings have never been intended to limit strength, but to > > limit time. Obviously these are correlated, but the focus was always to > > make the engine as strong as possible with a tradeoff against speed. The > > differences between 2.0 and 3.8 are quite big and far from everything is > > related to searches. > > One thing to remember is that processing power is > much greater than when GNU Go was written, back in > the late 1990's when a typical processor was a 486. > > Some design decisions were made for weaker processors, > such as splitting off the reading code (which tries to > decide if a string can be captured by a forced > sequence such as a ladder) from the owl code (which > very selectively tries to read out life and death). > > Therefore if GNU Go was written today it would be written > differently. > > Even at level 10, GNU Go is not very strong compared > to modern programs. It is something like 10 kyu. > So intentionally weakening it by running it at a lower > level might be interesting to complete beginners, but I > think if someone has been playing for a few months > they will want to run it at level 10. > > Dan > > > _______________________________________________ > gnugo-devel mailing list > gnugo-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel >
_______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list gnugo-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
