> code (and coder) sane, we need to be able to write some code which doesn't
> care
> whether it's a person or an org.
> I fear this is going to be like path., where national-specific requirements
> are (politely I admit) ignored.
> I appreciate this is 0.1, I'd be happy with a promise that you will consider
> changes in future for our requirements
Promised.
> class BasicPatDetailsPage(wxPython.wizard.wxWizardPageSimple):
> """
> Wizard page for entering patient's basic demographic information
> """
> #--------------------------------------------------------
> def __init__(self, parent, title):
> """
> Creates a new instance of BasicPatDetailsPage
> @param parent - The parent widget
> @type parent - A wxWindow instance
> @param tile - The title of the page
> @type title - A StringType instance
> """
> wxPython.wizard.wxWizardPageSimple.__init__(self, parent) #,
> bitmap =
> gmGuiHelpers.gm_icon(_('oneperson'))
>
> Personally, I think this is a bad idea. It seems a fairly pointless
> duplication of the existing interface.
The existing *edit* interface wasn't going anywhere I could see. The
wizard is a quick-and-dirty *input* interface for 0.1. If someone
writes something better for 0.2 I am all fine with it. We have
been thinking about reusing the individal pages inside
notebook pages for editing demographics.
> I suppose its possible to integrate editing later, nevertheless
> I would have apprecipated some discussion on the list before going ahead
> with this.
It can be dumped soon enough. Entering a new patient is a
well-defined *task* akin to "installing some software" or
"running through a file sequentially". Unlike editing
demographics which is "random access to a file".
> >> - enter and view simple free text narratives
> >both work
> huh? where? (yes I am using latest CVS)
There are two viewers: Journal and tree. There is one progress
note input widget, namely multi sashed progress note. Run 0.1.
> >> - create, edit, view a past history list
> >
> >a) past history list as in past medical history ?
> > - not necessarily 0.1 IMO but arguably so
> >
> >b) or past history list as in past and present problem list ?
> > - that we already have
> where ?
You can see it in the progress note editor and in the EMR tree
browser. You can add problems simply by adding a note for
them. We need more code around that, agreed.
> >> - upload and view documents
> >already works but not 0.1-target IMO
> Agreed,
Thanks.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
_______________________________________________
Gnumed-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
