> > Tim, do you consider document handling crucial for 0.1 ? 
> No.
Thanks.

> > Also,
> > is past medical history handling a must for a
> > plausible-promise first release ?
> I think so.
OK. So:

- past history as in past medical history ?

or

- past history as in list of past and present problems ?

> Higher priority than lab results interfacing.
Agree. But that is 0.2 due to Jim's use case.

> But the aim should be to have all of these working
not for 0.1, IMO, not even "not-as-refined"

Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346


_______________________________________________
Gnumed-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel

Reply via email to