On Fri, 27 May 2005 00:30:49 +0200 Karsten Hilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:36:35PM +0200, Hilmar Berger wrote: > > > I tried to figure out what has to be done before 0.1 by > > looking at the TODO file, but couldn't find out which tasks are > > before and which post 0.1 - we will have to update this file > > once we will have decided on the functionality we want to > > provide. > The TODO *file* in CVS is basically *all* post-0.1. The Wiki > has the TODO for pre-0.1. > > > I looked at the modules that will go in 0.1 - and I am still > > not quite sure what we will show > Well, that is a list of functionality. It doesn't spell out > how it's being done. The status quo of "Release 0.1" is how > it's going to be done if you ask me. > > > and if these modules (Manual, > > EMR-tree, EMR-journal, Setup, Patient Details and Progress > > Notes) are in a presentable state. > You can find that out by running the Release condidate. If I remember well, running gm-0_1-from-cvs.sh should run it, shouldn't it ? If so, then the modules loaded (see above) do not fit the description of the current state in the wiki: http://salaam.homeunix.com/twiki/bin/view/Gnumed/WhatCanIActuallyDOWithGNUmedToday Maybe we should mark functionality exptected to work in 0.1 as such. > > Manual: > > This is quite outdated. Should we update it before the > > release of 0.1 or rather link to the wiki ? Or even provide a > > local copy of the wiki in the release package ? > Yes either way. I propose packaging a local copy of the relevant html-pages take from the wiki. Changing the User Manual in SGML is quite time-consuming. Will try to do that. > > EMR-tree / EMR- journal: These plugins show the same > > information, just the structure is different. Wouldn't it make > > sense to combine both in one plugin ? > Not now anymore IMO. Well, then some description in the User guide on what is the difference is desirable. > > Why not connect the code that adds a new patient > > to the Patient Details page ?? > the patient details page that used to be there isn't loaded in > the Release configuration anymore, we load Carlos' notebook > version now Do I have the wrong Release config ? I don't see Carlos' notebook version ... > > So, here are my suggestions: > > - fix the specs for 0.1 so that it shows how a potential user > > might work with gnumed. This includes a consistent concept and > > workflow > Feel free to make specific suggestions. Will look into this in more detail. > Notice how the manual in the Wiki does list how a potential > user might work with GNUmed. > > It is also quite apparent you have not worked in a medical > practice in the community. I have. And I have using GNUmed > (at it's current potential) - with real life data and not > fooling around. But you know how Gnumed works and how it is thought to be - a new user does not. And I had the impression that this new user might get confused when presented to it the first time. And there will be a lot of people that will look at Gnumed exactly one time to see if it is promising or not. > > - fix and subsequently freeze the data model (backend) > Feel free to suggest things that need fixing. What > deficiencies do you see that are relevant ot 0.1 ? I don't say deficiencies. I just noted that the sql-files were changed quite frequently in the CVS, indicating backend changes. Since the data model is the base of any further development, I suggested to get this in a stable state first and fix the GUI afterward. > > - write a basic user guide describing the concept and typical workflow > > within gnumed > feel free to go ahead I guess updating the user guide in the wiki will do. Hilmar -- _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
