On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:42:56AM +0200, Hilmar Berger wrote: > > > and if these modules (Manual, > > > EMR-tree, EMR-journal, Setup, Patient Details and Progress > > > Notes) are in a presentable state. > > You can find that out by running the Release condidate. > If I remember well, running gm-0_1-from-cvs.sh should run it, shouldn't it ? That is correct.
> If so, then the modules loaded (see above) do not fit the description of the > current state in the wiki: > http://salaam.homeunix.com/twiki/bin/view/Gnumed/WhatCanIActuallyDOWithGNUmedToday You are right. There are two pages that are not sufficiently marked as what they are. 1) the page you give is a list of what code is (or schould) be in working order currently 2) the Release 0.1 feature list I am referring to is what is intended to be functional *and supported* (that is the difference between them) for 0.1 I agree that the documentation ought to be much clearer/better on that. > > > Manual: > I propose packaging a local copy of the relevant html-pages take from the > wiki. Changing the User Manual in SGML is quite time-consuming. Will try to > do that. Thanks ! I agree. > > > EMR-tree / EMR- journal: These plugins show the same > > > information, just the structure is different. > Well, then some description in the User guide on what is the difference is > desirable. Surely correct. Do you think you can look at those and write something in the Wiki ? I could then come back and see exactly where the widgets don't have obvious appeal to a casual user. > > > Why not connect the code that adds a new patient > > > to the Patient Details page ?? > > the patient details page that used to be there isn't loaded in > > the Release configuration anymore, we load Carlos' notebook > > version now > Do I have the wrong Release config ? I don't see Carlos' notebook version ... Well, it went in two days ago :-) Oh, wait, the public server is not updated yet ... done ... > > Notice how the manual in the Wiki does list how a potential > > user might work with GNUmed. ... > But you know how Gnumed works and how it is thought to be - a > new user does not. Sure, that's why I started some documentation in the Wiki. > And I had the impression that this new user > might get confused when presented to it the first time. And > there will be a lot of people that will look at Gnumed exactly > one time to see if it is promising or not. I would welcome anyone looking at GNUmed, looking at the existing documentation and sending me patches for either one. > > > - fix and subsequently freeze the data model (backend) > I don't say deficiencies. I just noted that the sql-files > were changed quite frequently in the CVS, indicating backend > changes. Since the data model is the base of any further > development, I suggested to get this in a stable state first > and fix the GUI afterward. Oh, you meant "fix" in the sense of "fixate". I didn't get that. Surely, the schema will have to be frozen - eg tagged in CVS or something. Same for the code. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
