On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 10:30:12AM +1000, Tim Churches wrote: > Look, GNUmed is (collectively) your project - I am just an interested > observer - but I really don't understand why you need to change > Python-PostgreSQL database adaptors. We don't have to. What slightly bothers me is that pyPgSQL *seems* somewhat unmaintained. Other than that it's fine by me. Other people would like to switch to a fully-Python solution as that would allow us to more easily control dependancies (eg reduce them) or so is the idea. My opinion is that if that's a problem it's a sign of lacking package management of the platform.
We did talk about staying on pyPgSQL and perhaps sharing the workload between NetEpi and GNUmed in keeping the packages in sync with CVS should that be required. I certainly prefer not to move full maintenance of a DB-API adapter into GNUmed ! For me the one reason to switch would be to gain performance. Psycopg is said to be the one that's fastest. So, *if at all*, I'd consider that one. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
