On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 09:29:39AM +1000, Ian Haywood wrote: > >>, mirroring typical > >>> practice for one may not know until completion of the visit what the > >>> episode (or is it the AOE?) should be called. > > > > Precisely. I have always wondered why Richard thought so bad > > of the episode name field at the top. It's gone now but can > > easily be resurrected. > Well, it was me ;-) At the time I said I thought Richard would > also support this (removal of compulsory manual episode-naming) > Deriving episode-names from soAp etc. is entirely my own idea. Well, combining the epside naming field with derived defaults - would not that serve both purposes ?
The user *could* (but does not have to) manually chose an episode name. If the user did not manually name the episode a name would be derived from the progress note. Richard ? Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
