On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:59:11PM +0300, Peter Damoc wrote: > I can enforce a solution that will forbid concurrency. Concurrency is of > little importance compared to Consistency. That statement is not entirely true. If real life requires concurrency then solving concurrency is of high importance to conistency. Only if concurrency can be forced out of reality then there is no need to support it.
> I might be mistaken but this is one of the problems I perceived at GNUMed... > overdesign. Well, no. I am solving my real-world problem. My daily work includes concurrency. So that needs to be solved. I am encountering patient locks caused by concurrency constraints *daily* in the software that I use. Mind you, they are needed to ensure consistency but they do unnecessarily stop my workflow. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
