On Dienstag 26 Februar 2008, James Busser wrote: > was Re: [Gnumed-devel] text field "additional_result_info" needed in > clin.test_result > > On 25-Feb-08, at 1:08 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:25:21PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > >>>>> additional_result_info > >>>> > >>>> Is this not clin.test_result.note_provider ? > >>> > >>> I think I tripped on understand what is a "note_provider" ... > >> > >> Comment is to generic as there can be other comments, too. I'll go > >> with "note_test_org". > > > > Done. > > > >> Now I'll also make the clin.lab_request.test_org nullable since I > > > > Done. > > I am a bit confused... when I ran the bootstrapper some weeks ago, it > installed database schema _v8 which I assume was the version of the > then-current release. When I look at the wiki page for DatabaseSchema > the links to "release" reveal gnumed_v7 dumped January 7, 2008 > whereas "devel" links to gnumed_v8 dumped February 26.
I think the script that produces the output is not upto date and needs a version bump ? > > Therefore when Karsten makes a change, as with above, does this > update an unadvertised _v9 or if it updates _v8, how would someone > who is already at an (earlier) version of _v8 apply the update? > I believe they go into v9. v8 should be stable and if at all only see an update if there is a grave bug. But I am looking forward to Karsten's answer as well. -- Sebastian Hilbert Leipzig / Germany [www.gnumed.de] -> PGP welcome, HTML ->/dev/null _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
