On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 17:53 -0400, Louis E Garcia II wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 17:43 -0400, Louis E Garcia II wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 14:43 -0400, Morten Welinder wrote: > > > Recent gnumeric 1.7.x (such as .12) requires goffice 0.5.x. It is > > > gtkprint based. > > > > > > As for you goffice problem, you should open a bug report and include the > > > full > > > configure output. > > > > > > Morten > > > > Configure is not picking up some library. What other library does it > > need for gnome support? And why would goffice check for itself? > > > > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > > checking for GTK... yes > > checking for GNOME... no > > checking for GOFFICE... yes > > > > -Louis > > Seems I have an old libgsf-1.14.7 and the latest is 1.9.1. Will try > upgrading. > > config.log has: > > configure:21786: checking for GNOME > configure:21794: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors > "$goffice_gnome_reqs" > Package libgsf-gnome-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libgsf-gnome-1.pc' > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable > No package 'libgsf-gnome-1' found > configure:21797: $? = 1 > configure:21812: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors > "$goffice_gnome_reqs" > Package libgsf-gnome-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libgsf-gnome-1.pc' > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable > No package 'libgsf-gnome-1' found > configure:21815: $? = 1 > No package 'libgsf-gnome-1' found > configure:21843: result: no
Ok sorry for the noise I didn't have the libgsf-gnome-devel package installed. Seems goffice compiled fine with libgsf-1.14.7 -Louis _______________________________________________ gnumeric-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
