Thanks much. That eventually got me to <ftp.gnome.org> where I found
sources. (I don't understand why a search of <gnu.org> didn't yield
anything.) Using RPMs is nearly always preferable-- for it makes
package/systems management much easier. There are sites offering
gnumeric RPMs, but, for me at least, known reputable sites satisfy
security concerns.
--
War is a failure of the imagination.
--William Blake
On 10/03/2009 03:12 AM Emmanuel Pacaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On sam., 2009-10-03 at 05:46 +0200, ken wrote:
>> Just setting up a new (CentOS) system and can't find gnumeric here or
>> anywhere (RPM for CentOS/RH). Has it become a secret weapon or something?
>
> If you can't find a gnumeric RPM for Centos, you have 2 options:
>
> - rebuild a src rpm, taken from antoher distribution, like explained in
> this thread:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/cen...@centos.org/msg05834.html
>
> But it may be hard to get a recent gnumeric version this way.
>
> - or build from sources. I think you will only need to compile gnumeric,
> goffice and libgsf, if you install the distribution RPMs of the other
> gnumeric dependencies (but I may be wrong, I don't use Centos).
>
> Emmanuel.
>
_______________________________________________
gnumeric-list mailing list
gnumeric-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
