On 30/05/15 17:11, jan marco alkema wrote: > Hello Christian, > > I am look to blockchain concept (of Bitcoin). > > Source: > http://www.wired.com/2014/03/decentralized-applications-built-bitcoin-great-except-whos-responsible-outcomes/ > > "Thus, while they enable a whole new set of possibilities, > blockchain-based applications also present legal > <http://www.wired.com/opinion/2014/03/safe-harbor-for-finance-startups-regulation/>, > technical, and social challenges similar to those raised by other P2P > applications that came before them, such as BitTorrent, Tor, or Freenet. > But some of these challenges haven’t been seen before in the context of > traditional P2P networks." > > . > . > > "As such, the bitcoin platform (or blockchain) allows for the deployment > of decentralized applications that combine the benefits of cloud > computing — in terms of ubiquity and elasticity — with the benefits of > P2P technologies in terms of privacy and anonymity. Even though the > blockchain is inherently transparent (as every transaction is recorded > on a public ledger), users can have multiple identities that don’t > necessarily relate to their real persona." > > Blockchain-based applications can therefore address user’s privacy > through anonymity. > > Is there integration of blockchain (concept) and gnunet possible/useful? > > Greetings Jan Marco > > > > _______________________________________________ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers > I dont think blockchain would be useful for gnunet
if two independent node go out of sync for 10 minutes, two out-of-sync blockchains are created -- tom sparks x86? We ain't got no x86. We don't need no stinking x86! _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
