On 23.12.2015 12:09, Christian Grothoff wrote: > I would like to ask all contributors/developers to assign their > copyright on GNUnet code to "GNUnet e.V." (https://gnunet.org/ev) > > The reason is that situations continue to pop up where the ability to > dual-license some code would be helpful for the project (similar to how > we added GPL+eCos to GNU libmicrohttpd in the past). If we had the > copyright with GNUnet e.V., then at least we had a relatively small > group (the annually elected "Vorstand") representing the developers in a > position of making decisions about dual-licensing. >
I will sign away my copyright to anything i've contributed to GNUnet (and, if you want, GNUnet-gtk and Extractor; by the way, what's the status of MHD in this regard? Though my contributions to MHD are very minor, so it shouldn't matter), on the condition that my contributions are dual-licensed under GPLv2+ (or GPLv3+, or v4+, or whatever) and LGPLv2.1+ (and i'll bump v2.1+ to v3+ or even higher as needed). The reason for this is that i've tinkered with the utility code (mostly its W32 side) a lot and i would really like to be able to re-use it elsewhere, as an LGPL library or in a project that is LGPL-licensed (in glib and GTK+, for example). -- O< ascii ribbon - stop html email! - www.asciiribbon.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
