Christian Grothoff <[email protected]> skribis: > The reason is that situations continue to pop up where the ability to > dual-license some code would be helpful for the project (similar to how > we added GPL+eCos to GNU libmicrohttpd in the past). If we had the > copyright with GNUnet e.V., then at least we had a relatively small > group (the annually elected "Vorstand") representing the developers in a > position of making decisions about dual-licensing.
I’m guessing the second license would necessarily be more permissive than the GPL, no? Wouldn’t this amount to effectively relicensing everything under a permissive license? Ludo’. _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
