[email protected] transcribed 647 bytes: > Fixing up a man page for gnunet-gns-proxy-ca to get rid of the > symlink I looked at the code again. > > It seems as if the self-documenting output is a bit misleading > for people using it, or should be expanded. > > gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca works without passing an option argument. > If we do, "c" is the "-f"/"--filename" of gnunet-config. To keep > a common vocabulary between the pages and the options, shouldn't > it be -f for gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca, or am I misunderstanding > the script?
Let's try this... $ gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca ? [normal run, a cert is generated and installed] $ gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca -? Generating CA Illegal option -? Invalid option: - $ gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca -c Generating CA No arg for -c option Invalid option: - $ gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca c [normal run, a cert is generated and installed] Whatever we self-document is either too minimal AND/OR wrong. _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
