You are right, the existing option should probably be changed to -f. And if someone hacks options on that script, adding -c for the configuration file and -h for help and -v for version would also be good ideas...
On 3/7/19 12:34 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Fixing up a man page for gnunet-gns-proxy-ca to get rid of the > symlink I looked at the code again. > > It seems as if the self-documenting output is a bit misleading > for people using it, or should be expanded. > > gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca works without passing an option argument. > If we do, "c" is the "-f"/"--filename" of gnunet-config. To keep > a common vocabulary between the pages and the options, shouldn't > it be -f for gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca, or am I misunderstanding > the script? > > _______________________________________________ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers > _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
