Alon Bar-Lev wrote: >
But the work needs to be moved into gpg-agent... :(
You were referring to my PKCS#11 patch.. After studying the GPG architecture a bit, I think this needs to be moved into the scdaemon. gpg-agent actually does nothing with smart-cards - it uses scdaemon to do the work. Which is good, since the scdaemon's work is pretty simple; much simpler than that of gpg-agent's. The communication PROTOCOL (not API!) is publicly defined and is UNIX-socket based. I believe that writing a BSD-licensed PKCS#11 version of scdaemon is feasible. Then you use the 'p11-scdaemon' (let's call it that way) instead of the gpg's and voila! You have PKCS#11 support. Opinions?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
